Ex-President Aquino to face trial for Mamasapano tragedy

President Benigno Simeon Aquino III, together with Armed Forces of the Philippines (AFP) Chief of Staff General Hernando Iriberri, troops the line during the full military honors accorded to the Commander-in-Chief upon his arrival for the commemorative activities of the 30th anniversary of the EDSA People Power Revolution at the People Power Monument in White Plains corner Epifanio de los Santos Avenue (EDSA) Thursday February 25, 2016. This year’s theme is “EDSA 30 Pagbabago Ipinaglaban N’yo Itutuloy Ku!”.The 1986 peaceful and bloodless uprising ousted the dictatorship and catapulted the late Corazon C. Aquino to the Presidency. (Photo by: Robert Viñas/ Malacañang Photo Bureau).

MANILA, July 14 — Ombudsman Conchita Carpio Morales has ordered the filing of criminal charges against former President Benigno “Noynoy” S. Aquino, Jr. for his alleged liability in the Mamasapano massacre.

In a resolution approved on Friday, Morales ordered the filing of charges against Aquino for usurpation of authority and violation of Section 3(a) of Republic Act No. 3019, or the “Anti-Graft and Corrupt Practices Act”.

Standing as Aquino’s co-conspirators are former Philippine National Police (PNP) Director General Alan Purisima and Director Getulio Napeñas of the PNP Special Action Force (PNP-SAF).

It can be recalled that close to midnight of Jan. 24, 2015, almost 400 highly-trained commandos belonging to the elite SAF, unilaterally launched “Oplan Exodus” to serve standing warrants of arrest against internationally-wanted terrorists Zulkifli Bin Hir alias “Marwan” and Ahmad Akmad Uson in Mamasapano, Maguindanao.

In the ensuing firefight that lasted for several hours, 44 SAF troopers died in the line of duty.

According to the complainants, the criminal negligence of Aquino was based on several acts:

— participation and assistance in the planning of Oplan Exodus with gross and inexcusable negligence;

— approving the operation with full knowledge that it was flawed;

— for allowing suspended PNP Chief Purisima not only to participate in the planning, but also in the running of said operation and proving information and intelligence, thereby giving pseudo-legal power to a suspended official; and

— breach in the established norms inherent in a chain of command.

In the investigation, the Ombudsman said “there is no gainsaying that President Aquino was fully aware that the Office of the Ombudsman had placed Purisima under preventive suspension at that time (for the anomalous Werfest deal).”

Despite this, SMS exchanges between Aquino and Purisima showed that the suspended police chief played a major role in the botched operation.

“The fact remains that, at the time, particularly before and during the actual implementation of Oplan Exodus, Purisima was under preventive suspension, and that Purisima, despite being under preventive suspension, indeed played an active role in Oplan Exodus, as shown by all the record of SMS exchanges and findings in the Senate Committee Report on the Mamasapano incident, to the point that he was exercising a degree of authority and discretion over Napeñas and consequently, over the operation,” the Ombudsman consolidated resolution said.

Morales said that “certainly a public officer who is under preventive suspension in barred from performing any public functions and from meddling into the affairs of the government. In other words, Purisima would not have been placed in such a position of continuing to conduct himself, in relation to Oplan Exodus, in a manner as if he was not under preventive suspension at that time, from his position as PNP chief, were it not for the complicity and influence of President Aquino.”

For the offense under Section 3(a) of RA No. 3019, all the foregoing circumstances establish probable cause that, with the complicity and influence of President Aquino, the order of preventive suspension issued by the Ombudsman was violated.

Under Section 3(a) of RA No. 3019, it shall be unlawful for any public officer to persuade, induce or influence another public officer to perform an act constituting a violation of rules and regulations duly promulgated by competent authority or an offense in connection with the official duties of the latter, or allowing himself to be persuaded, induced, or influenced to commit such violation or offense.

Meanwhile, under Article 177 of the Revised Penal Code (RPC), usurpation of authority is committed by any person who shall knowingly and falsely represent himself to be an officer, agent or representative of any department or agency of the Philippine Government, or who, under pretense of official position, shall perform any act pertaining to any person in authority or public officer of the Philippine Government, or any agency thereof, without being lawfully entitled to do so. Perfecto Raymundo/

Exit mobile version